YELLOW JOURNALISM IS FINELY TUNED IN 2015
I have just finished writing Miracle in Atlanta, my own personal story of meeting and besting the IRS deceivers and the AUSA in federal court. It is not only the biggest book (360 pages, 8.5×11) I have ever written, but by far the most important and contains the only method by which one can expect to win against Satan’s agents. Some of the things I said to the court (and with impunity) were honest and truthful but could never have been uttered by a licensed lawyer without a looming contempt charge, and because some of the developments became too outrageous to have been believed, I even dug out the court transcripts and printed them for further proof for the reader of what actually went on. With all that, I can agree with the few people that read the manuscript and remarked, “No book like this has ever been written.”
For many years I have heard that “there is no silver bullet,” but I know that there is One and that it is flawless for anyone following it to the end. It works 100% of the time. More about that later.
Meanwhile, over the past six months of writing and reviewing court transcripts, I have become re-acquainted with the depths of deception to which the domestic enemies will reach in order to gain a conviction. This includes the planting of false stories in the local and national media to help pre-convict a defendant before a jury is even called for a voir dire examination. It is a “cheap shot” and in recent years has become not only far more prevalent but all encompassing. It is a silent and passive brain-washing tool of the enemy in the war of “Government vs. We, the People.”
Having been a victim of a few media cheap shots both before and after the aforementioned ordeal of mine, I believe I am more aware of the 21st century fine-tuning of this art than most Americans.
Here is what I mean. And if someone wants to comment, I will be happy to hear, but if you choose to call me “pro-Nazi” because of my observations here, then I will quickly label you as being as prejudiced as the author of this article below. This week, someone sent this. Please pay attention. It’s the way truth is twisted. For the visually impaired, I have emboldened the important stuff:
Giant Swastika Spread On San Francisco HS Football Field
A huge white swastika is spread on the football field at a San Francisco high school after graduation ceremonies.
By: Hana Levi Julian
Published: June 3rd, 2015
- Anti-Semitic vandals snapped together white plastic tiles to form a giant swastika on the football field of El Camino High School in San Francisco. Anti-Semitism is alive and kicking in San Francisco, California . . .
A giant swastika was plastered on El Camino High School’s football field sometime after graduation last Friday, and stayed there, unnoticed, the entire weekend. Removable, snap-together tiles were linked together to construct the massive Nazi symbol of the Third Reich . . .
Custodians only noticed the swastika when they arrived at the field on Monday. They immediately alerted school officials and then pulled it apart. But some residents had already seen the hateful symbol.
QUESTION: How and when did the swastika become “the hateful symbol” and who made it so?
Didja’ know that the exact opposite connotation of the swastika is as old as world history? It was used at least 5,000 years before Adolf Hitler designed the Nazi flag. The word swastika comes from the Sanskrit svastika, which means “good fortune” or “well-being. To this day it is a sacred symbol in Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Odinism. It is a common sight on temples or houses in India or Indonesia. Swastikas also have an ancient history in Europe, appearing on artifacts from pre-Christian European cultures. In the beginning of the twentieth century the swastika was widely used in Europe. It had numerous meanings, the most common being a symbol of good luck and auspiciousness. (And this was garnered from the Holocaust Museum’s own Memorial site, of all places.)
For loathsome, cowardly alleged “anti-Semites” to deface the walls of a Jewish synagogue with hate speech (something Jews have been known to do themselves in order to gain sympathy) is one thing, but for a bunch of mischievous teenagers (the likely culprits in this “crime story”) to throw down a few tiles on the football field in the shape of a swastika for laughs and then for the Jewish Press to mold it into “hate” is a little out of bounds. And if it really was a silent protest, how do we know it wasn’t against the objectionable tactics of one or more of the coaches?
All this is so reminiscent of past yellow journalism. Let us review. First of all, where is the “anti-Semitic stuff that is still alive and kicking” anywhere other than where those creators of same drag it up?
El Camino High School, I have just confirmed with a brief telephone call to its offices, is a public high school. It has no religious affiliations with any private schools such as Protestant Christian, Catholic or Jewish. This is quite a stretch for some writer to create a story that “. . . Anti-Semitism is alive and kicking in San Francisco, California . . .” and appears more as a futile grasping of straws as well as hate-mongering on its own.
Then at the website’s Comment Section, it warns: Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost{sic}. If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.
But we have to wonder about just how “civilized” the reception might be regarding that long ago disproven number of “Six million” and what argument would the editors present for a “meaningful debate.” Despite the fact that exposing of the great exaggeration has forced the change of wording at the entrance signs at Auschwitz, the impossible number of 6,000,000 is still used universally, and in some countries, people are jailed for questioning this. Can these things no longer be debated? https://endzog.wordpress.com/2015/05/29/german-television-exposes-holohoax-lies-historic-broadcast-shocks-germany/ .
And what about the terrorists that attacked the USS Liberty 48 years ago? Will my permission to comment be revoked should I advocate the capture and trials of these criminals?
So is truth anti-Semitic? No, it is not racist either. In this same file drawer we find that the Confederate flag is now a “symbol of racism.” Hmmmm. How and when did that happen, and by whom?
The 21st century American should first understand that the Union vs. Confederacy was a year and a half into the war before it was decided that it should be about “slavery.” This came about when Frederick Douglas paid a visit to Abe Lincoln in the White House and made him understand that it takes this kind of emotional provocation to move people to a cause. (The real reasons were financial, as usual.)
Has Al “Not So” Sharpton ever considered that no slave ship ever traveled the seas under a Confederate flag? And how many Americans know that the Confederate Constitution made such a thing unlawful? That’s right. Here is Art. I, Sec. 9: “The importation of Negroes of the African race from any foreign country other than the slaveholding States or Territories of the United States of America, is hereby forbidden; and Congress is required to pass such laws as shall effectually prevent the same.”
And not only that, but there was talk by the higher-up officials to insert a clause to phase out and end the legality of slavery as soon as the war was won and ended. But at the time of the CSA constitution’s ratification, the door was left open for trading amongst the states with this clause: “Congress shall also have power to prohibit the introduction of slaves from any State not a member of, or Territory not belonging to, this Confederacy.”
And why would that be? Because of the large number of slaves occupying the northern states. Many free Negroes owned black slaves; in fact, in numbers disproportionate to their representation in society at large. The doors to free trade between the new nation and the old Union were remaining open, but the CSA, as a separate nation, was retaining the right to slam them shut later, too. Here are some facts:
In 1830, a fourth of the free Negro slave masters in South Carolina owned 10 or more slaves; eight owning 30 or more.
According to federal census reports, on June 1, 1860 there were nearly 4.5 million Negroes in the United States, with fewer than four million of them living in the southern slaveholding states.
Of the blacks residing in the South, 261,988 were not slaves. Of this number, 10,689 lived in New Orleans. Black Duke University professor John Hope Franklin recorded that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned slaves, or 28 percent of the free Negroes in that city.
In 1860 there were at least six Negroes in Louisiana who owned 65 or more slaves. The largest number, 152 slaves, were owned by the widow C. Richards and her son P.C. Richards, who owned a large sugar cane plantation.
Another Negro slave magnate in Louisiana, with over 100 slaves, was Antoine Dubuclet, a sugar planter whose estate was valued at (in 1860 dollars) $264,000.
In Charleston, South Carolina in 1860, 125 free Negroes owned slaves; six of them owning 10 or more. Of the $1.5 million in taxable property owned by free Negroes in Charleston, more than $300,000 represented slave holdings. In North Carolina 69 free Negroes were slave owners.
In 1860, only a small minority of whites owned slaves. According to the US census report for that last year before the Civil War, there were nearly 27 million whites in the country. Some eight million of them lived in the slaveholding states.
The census also determined that there were fewer than 385,000 individuals who owned slaves. Even if all slaveholders had been white, that would amount to only 1.4 percent of whites in the country (or 4.8 percent of southern whites owning one or more slaves).
The figures show conclusively that, when free, blacks disproportionately became slave masters in pre-Civil War America. The statistics outlined above show that about 28 percent of free blacks owned slaves—as opposed to less than 4.8 percent of southern whites, and dramatically more than the 1.4 percent of all white Americans who owned slaves. One the other hand, Many free Negroes owned black slaves; in fact, in numbers disproportionate to their representation in society at large.
(Source: Black Masters: A Free Family of Color in the Old South, Michael P. Johnson and James L. Roak New York: Norton, 1984.)
————-
So what is my point with all this? Well, I can tell you: it is not that I wish to own slaves any more than I want to paint swastikas on synagogues. It is just that I cannot stomach the deception of yellow journalism, and I’m just musing along about history. It seems like everything they ever told me was a lie. OH, what a great title for a book!
